United States v. Harris
United States v. Harris
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6277
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BELTON HARRIS, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-99-1055; CA-03-82)
Submitted: April 15, 2004 Decided: November 9, 2004
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Belton Harris, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Belton Harris, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s
orders denying his petition filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2255(2000) and
his motion for reconsideration of that order. We have
independently reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We
therefore affirm both orders on the reasoning of the district
court. See United States v. Harris, Nos. CR-99-1055; CA-03-82
(D.S.C. filed Aug. 18, 2003, and entered Aug. 19, 2003; filed Jan.
9, 2004, and entered Jan. 12, 2004). We deny Harris’s motion for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished