Gregory v. SC Dept of Transportation
Gregory v. SC Dept of Transportation
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2422
LEONARD GREGORY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; BECKY DICKSON; OSCAR K. RUCKER; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT; LONNA BLUE; CHARLES STIGGER; CLAUDIA WILKES,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DUDLEY GREGORY,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-03-1651-18-2)
Submitted: October 27, 2004 Decided: November 17, 2004
Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chalmers C. Johnson, CHALMERS JOHNSON LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. J. Strom Thurmond, Jr., United States Attorney, John H. Douglas, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina; Robert L. Widener, MCNAIR LAW FIRM, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, Michael A. Scardato, MCNAIR LAW FIRM, P.A., Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Leonard Gregory appeals the district court’s order
dismissing this action because the State Defendants are immune from
suit under the Eleventh Amendment and his claims against the
Federal Defendants are barred by sovereign immunity. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gregory
v. South Carolina Dep’t of Transp., No. CA-03-1651-18-2 (D.S.C.
Oct. 29, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished