Christopher Chad Davis appeals his conviction for assault on an officer with a dangerous weapon, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 111 (West 2000 & Supp. 2004), alleging that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction. Construing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, we find that any rational factfinder could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 80, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942). Accordingly, we affirm Davis’ conviction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED