Ruth Anderson appeals the district court’s order dismissing her claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, for her failure to comply with the magistrate judge’s order. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. See Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93 (4th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, we deny Anderson’s motion for protective custody and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Anderson v. Old Dominion Job, No. CA-03-52-6 (W.D.Va. May 24, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED