Lynn Howard appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Howard v. United States Army, No. CA-03-1368-1 (E.D. Va. filed June 7 & entered June 9, 2004). We deny the motion filed by attorney George R. Royer to appear on Howard’s behalf as counsel pro hac vice as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED