Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Construction

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Construction

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1041

MICHAEL T. MASUOKA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

G.W. MURPHY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Employer; ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Insurance Carrier; JOHN AND JANE DOES, Entities; DOES CORPORATION, Entities; DOES PARTNERSHIP, Entities; JOHN AND JANE DOES; GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 04-1568

MICHAEL T. MASUOKA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

G.W. MURPHY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee, and

ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.; KENNETH T. GOYA, Insurance Agent,

Defendants.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, James C. Cacheris, District Judges. (CA-02-1671; CA-00-829)

Submitted: November 17, 2004 Decided: December 3, 2004

Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael T. Masuoka, Appellant Pro Se. Mark David Crawford, FRIEDLANDER, MISLER, SLOAN, KLETZKIN & OCHSMAN, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Michael T. Masuoka appeals

the district court’s orders denying his various post-judgment

motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Constr. Co., Nos. CA-02-1671;

CA-00-829 (E.D. Va. Dec. 2, 2003; filed Dec. 4 & entered Dec. 5,

2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished