Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Construction
Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Construction
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1041
MICHAEL T. MASUOKA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
G.W. MURPHY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Employer; ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Insurance Carrier; JOHN AND JANE DOES, Entities; DOES CORPORATION, Entities; DOES PARTNERSHIP, Entities; JOHN AND JANE DOES; GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 04-1568
MICHAEL T. MASUOKA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
G.W. MURPHY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee, and
ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.; KENNETH T. GOYA, Insurance Agent,
Defendants.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, James C. Cacheris, District Judges. (CA-02-1671; CA-00-829)
Submitted: November 17, 2004 Decided: December 3, 2004
Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael T. Masuoka, Appellant Pro Se. Mark David Crawford, FRIEDLANDER, MISLER, SLOAN, KLETZKIN & OCHSMAN, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Michael T. Masuoka appeals
the district court’s orders denying his various post-judgment
motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Constr. Co., Nos. CA-02-1671;
CA-00-829 (E.D. Va. Dec. 2, 2003; filed Dec. 4 & entered Dec. 5,
2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished