Fields v. Rubenstein
Fields v. Rubenstein
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7140
STEWART L. FIELDS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JIM RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner; WILLIAM S. HANIES, Warden; BILL ESLIE, Associate Warden of Operations; BOBBY HAMRICK, Medical Administrator; CLIFFTON HYRE, M.D., O.D.; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES; JANE DOE; JOHN DOE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
WEST VIRGINIA BOARD OF RISKS AND INSURANCES MANAGEMENT,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-2)
Submitted: November 18, 2003 Decided: November 29, 2004
Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steward L. Fields, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Stewart L. Fields appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) action and denying several
motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Fields v. Rubenstein, No. CA-04-2 (N.D.W. Va. May 28,
& June 15, 2004). We grant Fields’ motion to dismiss John and Jane
Doe as parties to the appeal. We deny Fields’ motions for
appointment of counsel, injunctive relief and damages, and service
of three Appellees. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished