U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2004

In Re: Fredrick v.

In Re: Fredrick v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 10, 2004 · Motz, Duncan, Hamilton
114 F. App'x 583

In Re: Fredrick v.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ralph Franklin Fredrick petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition, deny Fredrick’s motion to expand the record, and deny his motion to expedite. Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.