Edward Stargen appeals a district court order denying his motion for reconsideration under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and seeking relief as a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Stargen, No. CR-99-30 (N.D.W.Va., Sept. 2, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED