Wells v. Ray

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Wells v. Ray, 115 F. App'x 136 (4th Cir. 2004)

Wells v. Ray

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Melvin B. Wells, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wells v. Ray, No. CA-04-219-2 (E.D. Va. filed July 6, 2004 & entered July 7, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
Melvin B. WELLS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Clark RAY, City of Norfolk, Neighborhood Preservation, Defendant-Appellee
Status
Unpublished