King v. Lee

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

King v. Lee

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7211

LESLIE CLAY KING,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ROBEY C. LEE; SHERRY MCFEATERS; JANE DOE, a/k/a R. Mac; DONALD LISH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-04-414-1-H)

Submitted: November 3, 2004 Decided: December 13, 2004

Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leslie Clay King, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Leslie Clay King appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) action as frivolous pursuant

to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

King v. Lee, No. CA-04-414-1-H (E.D.N.C. July 7, 2004). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished