McNeill v. Vanburen

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

McNeill v. Vanburen

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7253

JAMES C. MCNEILL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SHARON SNYDER, LPN; ELEXIA CRAIG, LPN,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

DENNIS VANBUREN, 2nd Shift Lieutenant; BENJAMIN LEA, 2nd Shift Sergeant; MARY WATSON, RN; MS. ROYSTER, 2nd Shift C/O; HOWARD CRABTREE, 2nd Shift C/O; ASHANTI WILLIAMS, 2nd Shift C/O; JAMES WILLIAMS, 2nd Shift C/O; NORWOOD, 2nd Shift C/O; LINDA MORGAN, 3rd Shift C/O,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-03-120-5-BO)

Submitted: December 16, 2004 Decided: December 22, 2004

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James C. McNeill, Appellant Pro Se. Deborrah Lynn Newton, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

James C. McNeill appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

McNeill v. Vanburen, No. CA-03-120-5-BO (E.D.N.C. July 13, 2004).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished