McNeill v. Vanburen
McNeill v. Vanburen
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7253
JAMES C. MCNEILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SHARON SNYDER, LPN; ELEXIA CRAIG, LPN,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DENNIS VANBUREN, 2nd Shift Lieutenant; BENJAMIN LEA, 2nd Shift Sergeant; MARY WATSON, RN; MS. ROYSTER, 2nd Shift C/O; HOWARD CRABTREE, 2nd Shift C/O; ASHANTI WILLIAMS, 2nd Shift C/O; JAMES WILLIAMS, 2nd Shift C/O; NORWOOD, 2nd Shift C/O; LINDA MORGAN, 3rd Shift C/O,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-03-120-5-BO)
Submitted: December 16, 2004 Decided: December 22, 2004
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James C. McNeill, Appellant Pro Se. Deborrah Lynn Newton, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
James C. McNeill appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
McNeill v. Vanburen, No. CA-03-120-5-BO (E.D.N.C. July 13, 2004).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished