Rouse v. Tennis

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Rouse v. Tennis

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7083

GERRY LEE ROUSE, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KERMIT TENNIS, Police Officer,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CA-03-739-2)

Submitted: December 16, 2004 Decided: December 21, 2004

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerry Lee Rouse, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Melvin Wayne Ringer, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Gerry Lee Rouse, Sr. appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant and dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Rouse v. Tennis, No. CA-03-739-2 (E.D.

Va. June 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished