Rouse v. Tennis
Rouse v. Tennis
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7083
GERRY LEE ROUSE, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KERMIT TENNIS, Police Officer,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CA-03-739-2)
Submitted: December 16, 2004 Decided: December 21, 2004
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerry Lee Rouse, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Melvin Wayne Ringer, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Gerry Lee Rouse, Sr. appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant and dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Rouse v. Tennis, No. CA-03-739-2 (E.D.
Va. June 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished