Clayton v. Ameriquest Mortgage

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Clayton v. Ameriquest Mortgage

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1849

HAYWOOD M. CLAYTON; SYLVIA K. CLAYTON,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

LAWRENCE S. MAITIN; MORRIS, SCHNEIDER & PRIOR, LLC,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-02-415-1)

Submitted: November 10, 2004 Decided: December 29, 2004

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Haywood M. Clayton, Sylvia K. Clayton, Appellants Pro Se. Dena Beth Langley, Stuart Carlen Gauffreau, NEXSEN PRUET ADAMS KLEEMEIER, PLLC, Greensboro, North Carolina; Angel R. Gordon, MORRIS, SCHNEIDER & PRIOR, LLC, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Haywood M. Clayton and Sylvia K. Clayton appeal from the

district court’s orders granting Ameriquest Mortgage Company’s

motion to enforce the settlement agreement between the parties and

denying the Claytons’ motion for reconsideration of that order. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Clayton v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co., No. CA-02-415-1

(M.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 2004 & filed June 18, 2004; entered June 21,

2004). In light of this disposition, we deny the Claytons’ motion

for a stay pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished