U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2004

McLaughlin-Cox v. Maryland Parole Commission

McLaughlin-Cox v. Maryland Parole Commission
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 16, 2004 · Duncan, Luttig, Shedd
85 F. App'x 903

McLaughlin-Cox v. Maryland Parole Commission

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

John McLaughlin-Cox appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McLaughlin-Cox v. Maryland Parole Comm’n, No. CA-02-4204-MJG (D.Md. Aug. 15, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.