U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2004

Taylor v. Medford

Taylor v. Medford
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 10, 2004 · Niemeyer, Shedd, Wilkinson
89 F. App'x 399

Taylor v. Medford

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Freddie D. Taylor appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Taylor v. Medford, No. CA-03-202-1-02-MU (W.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.