Barron v. Beardsley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Barron v. Beardsley, 89 F. App'x 416 (4th Cir. 2004)

Barron v. Beardsley

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Bret Michael Barron seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Barron has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Reference

Full Case Name
Bret Michael BARRON v. Ralph S. BEARDSLEY Charles Condon, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published