U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2004

United States v. Smith

United States v. Smith
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 25, 2004 · Gregory, Niemeyer, Shedd
89 F. App'x 823

United States v. Smith

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

David Elijah Smith appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Smith’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Smith, No. CR-93-16 (E.D.N.C. June 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.