U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2004

Seymour v. Basham

Seymour v. Basham
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 19, 2004
90 F. App'x 50

Seymour v. Basham

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Edward Thomas Seymour, III appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Seymour v. Basham, Nos. CA-03-1009-1-MJG; CA-03-1138-1-MJG (D.Md. filed Dec. 23, 2003 & entered Dec. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.