Edward Thomas Seymour, III, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Seymour v. Lusby, No. CA-03-1137-1-MJG (D.Md. Jan. 14, 2004). We deny Seymour’s motions to file a formal brief, for oral argument, and for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED