Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2004

Christian v. So & Kim, Inc.

Christian v. So & Kim, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 3, 2004
103 F. App'x 756

Christian v. So & Kim, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Tanja J. Christian appeals the magistrate judge’s order* dismissing her employment discrimination complaint, filed on June 26, 2004, as untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Christian v. So & Kim, Inc., No. CA-03-505-3 (E.D.Va. Nov. 20, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑