U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2004

Rankins v. Currie

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 11, 2004 · Hamilton, Michael, Shedd

104 F. App'x 320

Counsel

Michael Rankins, Appellant pro se. James Philip Allen, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Rankins v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2018)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Michael Rankins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and conclude this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rankins v. Currie, No. CA-02-784-5-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.