U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2004

Moseley v. Price

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 23, 2004

106 F. App'x 873

Counsel

Jonathon Moseley, Appellant pro se. John Adrian Gibney, Jr., Thompson & McMullan, Richmond, Virginia, James Christian Stuchell, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia; Alexander Francuzenko, O’Connell, O’Con-nell & Sarsfield, Rockville, Maryland; Robert Theodore Mitchell, Jr., Winchester, Virginia, for Appellees.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Jonathon Moseley appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Moseley v. Price, 300 F.Supp.2d 389 (E.D.Va. 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.