Crisp v. North Carolina Department of Corrections

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Crisp v. North Carolina Department of Corrections, 109 F. App'x 615 (4th Cir. 2004)

Crisp v. North Carolina Department of Corrections

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Taurice M. Crisp seeks to appeal the district court’s order directing prison officials to deduct a percentage of his monthly income from his prison account to pay the filing fee. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Crisp seeks to appeal is neither a *616final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Reference

Full Case Name
Taurice M. CRISP v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Doctor Bowman Mr. Munns Doctor Shodell
Status
Published