U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2004

King v. Law Firm of Goldman & Vetter

King v. Law Firm of Goldman & Vetter
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 6, 2004
110 F. App'x 332

King v. Law Firm of Goldman & Vetter

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

James King, Linda King, and Wendy King appeal the district court’s order dismissing sua sponte their civil complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See King v. Law Firm of Goldman & Vetter, No. CA-02-2164-AMD (D.Md. Jan. 13, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.