Crawford v. Brooks

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit December 1, 2004

Crawford v. Brooks, 114 F. App'x 113 (4th Cir. 2004)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Curtis E. Crawford appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying as moot his petitions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Crawford v. Brooks, No. CA-04-61 (E.D.Va. Sept. 21, 2004); Crawford v. Dir., Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-03-472 (E.D.Va. Sept. 21, 2004); Crawford v. Brooks, No. CA-04-59 (E.D.Va. Sept. 21, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name: Curtis E. CRAWFORD, Petitioner—Appellant v. Joseph M. BROOKS, Respondent—Appellee, and United States of America, Party in Interest Curtis E. Crawford, Petitioner—Appellant v. Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons Regional Director Federal Bureau of Prisons Joseph M. Brooks, Petersburg FCI Medium, Respondents—Appellees Curtis E. Crawford, Petitioner—Appellant v. Joseph M. Brooks, Warden Chairman, United States Parole Commission District of Columbia Board of Parole, Respondents—Appellees
Status: Published