Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Construction Co.
Opinion of the Court
In these consolidated appeals, Michael T. Masuoka appeals the district court’s orders denying his various post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Constr. Co., Nos. CA-02-1671; CA-00-829 (E.D. Va. Dec. 2, 2003; filed Dec. 4 & entered Dec. 5, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Michael T. MASUOKA, Plaintiff—Appellant v. G.W. MURPHY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Employer Argonaut Insurance Company, Inc., Insurance Carrier John and Jane Does, Entities Does Corporation, Entities Does Partnership, Entities John and Jane Does Governmental Entities, Defendants—Appellees Michael T. Masuoka, Plaintiff—Appellant v. G.W. Murphy Construction Company, Incorporated, Defendant—Appellee, and Argonaut Insurance Company, Inc. Kenneth T. Goya, Insurance Agent
- Status
- Published