Nancy D. Jonas appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for clarification. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Talley v. Jonas, No. CA-00-612-9-8 (D.S.C. July 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *561and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED