Clark v. Nixon

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Clark v. Nixon, 114 F. App'x 582 (4th Cir. 2004)

Clark v. Nixon

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Michael Craig Clark appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his civil complaint alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Clark v. Nixon, No. CA-02-47-2-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 18, 2002 & June 3, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
Michael Craig CLARK, Plaintiff—Appellant v. Jonathan NIXON Jeff Proctor State of North Carolina Donald Hobbs Kent Chappell Cliff Hobbs Paul Copeland Wally Hobbs Chad Matthews Alan Corprew Scott Waff, Defendants—Appellees, and Mark DAVIS John V. Matthews Perquimans County
Status
Published