McNeill v. Snyder

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit December 22, 2004

McNeill v. Snyder, 117 F. App'x 266 (4th Cir. 2004)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

James C. McNeill appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McNeill v. Vanburen, No. CA-03-120-5BO (E.D.N.C. July 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name: James C. MCNEILL v. Sharon SNYDER, LPN Elexia Craig, LPN, Defendants—Appellees, and Dennis VANBUREN, 2nd Shift Lieutenant Benjamin Lea, 2nd Shift Sergeant Mary Watson, RN Ms. Royster, 2nd Shift C/O Howard Crabtree, 2nd Shift C/O Ashanti Williams, 2nd Shift C/O James Williams, 2nd Shift C/O Norwood, 2nd Shift C/O Linda Morgan, 3rd Shift C/O
Status: Published