Jones v. Saar
Opinion of the Court
Charles Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Jones seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Charles JONES, a/k/a Nicholas Warner Jones, Plaintiff—Appellant v. Mary Ann SAAR, Maryland State Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services John Snowden, Lieutenant Julius Williams, Sargeant, Defendants—Appellees, and Dante Green, Prison 309110 Donald White Darryl Taylor, Prison 299166
- Status
- Published