Jones v. Saar

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jones v. Saar, 117 F. App'x 292 (4th Cir. 2004)

Jones v. Saar

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Charles Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Jones seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Reference

Full Case Name
Charles JONES, a/k/a Nicholas Warner Jones, Plaintiff—Appellant v. Mary Ann SAAR, Maryland State Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services John Snowden, Lieutenant Julius Williams, Sargeant, Defendants—Appellees, and Dante Green, Prison 309110 Donald White Darryl Taylor, Prison 299166
Status
Published