Head v. Rutherford County Sheriff's Department

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit January 11, 2004

Head v. Rutherford County Sheriff's Department, 118 F. App'x 670 (4th Cir. 2004)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Daniel Head appeals the district court’s orders (1) dismissing Head’s claim that he was denied his Fourteenth Amendment property rights and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Head v. Rutherford County Sheriffs Dep’t, No. CA-04-45-1 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 20, 2004, and May 11, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name: Timothy Daniel HEAD, Plaintiff—Appellant v. RUTHERFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, and Operations Center 911 Daniel J. Good, Sheriff, an individual Rutherford Town Police Department Greenway, Chief, an individual Forest City Police Department Randy Chapman, Chief, an individual Sprindale Police Department Deviney, Chief, an individual Town of Lake Lure, Police Department Mike Bustle, Chief, an individual, Defendants—Appellees
Status: Published