Osgar v. Barnhart

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Osgar v. Barnhart

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1685

BRYAN OSGAR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-02-2552-0-18BD)

Submitted: November 30, 2004 Decided: January 5, 2005

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

W. Daniel Mayes, Aiken, South Carolina, for Appellant. Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, J. Strom Thurmond, Jr., United States Attorney, Marvin J. Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Deana R. Ertl-Lombardi, Regional Chief Counsel, Laura Ridgell-Boltz, Assistant Regional Counsel, Denver, Colorado, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Bryan Osgar appeals the district court’s order accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and upholding the

Commissioner’s denial of Osgar’s application for disability

insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Osgar v.

Barnhart, No. CA-02-2552-0-18BD (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 2004). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished