Charles B. Brownell appeals the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000) complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brownell v. Secretary, Dep’t of Pub. Safety & Corr. Servs., No. CA-04-124-AW (D.Md. July 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED