Pauley v. Gandee

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Pauley v. Gandee, 118 F. App'x 739 (4th Cir. 2005)

Pauley v. Gandee

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Gene Pauley appeals the district court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pauley v. Gandee, No. CA-04-152-2 (S.D.W.Va. May 4, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
Dennis Gene PAULEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Loretta Simmons GANDEE; Kevin Wayne Gandee; Michael Clifford, Prosecutor; David L. Tucker, Sheriff, Defendants—Appellees
Status
Unpublished