In Re: Neal v.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
In Re: Neal v., 119 F. App'x 502 (4th Cir. 2005)

In Re: Neal v.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Lee Neal petitions for a writ of error coram nobis pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2000), alleging this Court erred in affirming his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (2000). Although we grant Neal leave to file supplemental material and to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we deny the petition because coram nobis relief is not available or appropriate in this case. See United States v. Addonizio, 442 U.S. 178, 186, 99 S.Ct. 2235, 60 L.Ed.2d 805 (1979); United States v. Mandel, 862 F.2d 1067, 1075 (4th Cir. 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Reference

Full Case Name
In Re: Christopher Lee NEAL, Petitioner
Status
Unpublished