Head v. Rutherford County Sheriff
Head v. Rutherford County Sheriff
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1893
TIMOTHY DANIEL HEAD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RUTHERFORD COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, and Operations Center 911; DANIEL J. GOOD, Sheriff, an individual; RUTHERFORD TOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT; GREENWAY, Chief, an individual; FOREST CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; RANDY CHAPMAN, Chief, an individual; SPRINDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT; DEVINEY, Chief, an individual; TOWN OF LAKE LURE, Police Department; MIKE BUSTLE, Chief, an individual,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-04-45-1)
Submitted: November 29, 2004 Decided: January 11, 2005
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Daniel Head, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Douglas MacLatchie, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, Sandra Moody King, RUSSELL & KING, Asheville, North Carolina, Matthew L. Mason, MOSS, MASON & HILL, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Timothy Daniel Head appeals the district court’s orders
(1) dismissing Head’s claim that he was denied his Fourteenth
Amendment property rights and (2) denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Head v. Rutherford County Sheriff’s Dep’t,
No. CA-04-45-1 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 20, 2004, and May 11, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished