Head v. Rutherford County Sheriff

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Head v. Rutherford County Sheriff

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1893

TIMOTHY DANIEL HEAD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RUTHERFORD COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, and Operations Center 911; DANIEL J. GOOD, Sheriff, an individual; RUTHERFORD TOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT; GREENWAY, Chief, an individual; FOREST CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; RANDY CHAPMAN, Chief, an individual; SPRINDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT; DEVINEY, Chief, an individual; TOWN OF LAKE LURE, Police Department; MIKE BUSTLE, Chief, an individual,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-04-45-1)

Submitted: November 29, 2004 Decided: January 11, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Daniel Head, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Douglas MacLatchie, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, Sandra Moody King, RUSSELL & KING, Asheville, North Carolina, Matthew L. Mason, MOSS, MASON & HILL, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Timothy Daniel Head appeals the district court’s orders

(1) dismissing Head’s claim that he was denied his Fourteenth

Amendment property rights and (2) denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Head v. Rutherford County Sheriff’s Dep’t,

No. CA-04-45-1 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 20, 2004, and May 11, 2004). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished