Williams v. Polk

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Williams v. Polk, 118 F. App'x 775 (4th Cir. 2005)

Williams v. Polk

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lacy Williams, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Williams v. Polk, No. CA-04-144-5-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 20, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
Lacy WILLIAMS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marvin L. POLK; Boyd Bennett; Cathy Judge; Jennie Lancaster; Marshall Pike; Benny Langdon; John A. Maness, Defendants—Appellees
Status
Unpublished