Williams v. Polk
Opinion
Lacy Williams, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Williams v. Polk, No. CA-04-144-5-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 20, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Lacy WILLIAMS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marvin L. POLK; Boyd Bennett; Cathy Judge; Jennie Lancaster; Marshall Pike; Benny Langdon; John A. Maness, Defendants—Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished