Stephney v. Seaside Truck
Stephney v. Seaside Truck
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7800
WADE STEPHNEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SEASIDE TRUCK, Auto Sales & Auto Salesmen; BOBBY SANDERS; RONNIE SANDERS; T. J. HARRIS; HORRY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; CRYSTAL BURKE; NORTH BEACH CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; PHIL WEBSTER, Lieutenant; JOEL MCGARTLIN; J. W. MILLER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-1381-4-27BH)
Submitted: January 13, 2005 Decided: January 21, 2005
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wade Stephney, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Wade Stephney appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stephney v.
Seaside Truck, No. CA-04-1381-4-27BH (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2004). We
deny Stephney’s “Notice and Motion for Continue to Amended
Additional Defendant,” and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished