U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

In Re: Stone v.

In Re: Stone v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 21, 2005

In Re: Stone v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1565

In Re: TAMMY M. STONE,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-04-44-2)

Submitted: August 27, 2004 Decided: January 21, 2005

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tammy M. Stone, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Tammy M. Stone has filed a petition for writ of mandamus.

Stone has failed to demonstrate that she has a clear and indisputable right to mandamus relief. See Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Accordingly, although we grant Stone’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.