Shirley v. SC Department

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Shirley v. SC Department

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7535

STEPHEN SHIRLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; H.A. LANGSTON, JR.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-03-1630-22BD)

Submitted: January 13, 2005 Decided: January 20, 2005

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Shirley, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, Robert W. Cone, MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Stephen Shirley appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) action. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Shirley v. Langston, No. 03-1630-22BD (D.S.C., filed Aug. 25, 2004

& entered Aug. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished