Pelletier v. Coleman

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Pelletier v. Coleman, 119 F. App'x 545 (4th Cir. 2005)

Pelletier v. Coleman

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Russell Adam Pelletier appeals the district court’s order entering judgment in favor of Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action pursuant to a jury verdict. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pelletier v. Coleman, No. CA-02-828-7 (W.D.Va. Sept. 7, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
Russell Adam PELLETIER, Plaintiff—Appellant, and Bobby Patterson; Alvin O. Washington; Layranzy Armstrong, Plaintiffs, v. Whitney COLEMAN; Bobby Hardison; Jack McKeen; Melba Jones; Kenneth Biller, Defendants—Appellees, and Berry; Lewis; Clatterbuck; Wolkowicz; Steven Keys; Luggar; Dyer; Gray; (Male); Garrison; McDanials; Graves; Aylor; Dr. Reese; Central Virginia Regional Jail, All Officers; E.L. Crosley; Randall J. Arft, Defendants
Cited By
1 case
Status
Unpublished