United States v. Little
United States v. Little
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7302
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL AARON LITTLE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-99-132; CA-01-702)
Submitted: December 23, 2004 Decided: January 19, 2005
Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Aaron Little, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Victoria Watford- McKinney, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Michael Aaron Little appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of
discretion. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See United States v. Little, Nos. CR-99-132; CA-
01-702 (E.D.N.C. July 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished