Lamine M. Diack appeals the district court’s order awarding summary judgment to the Defendant on his employment discrimination action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Diack v. Whole Foods Market, Inc., No. CA-03-2417-8-RWT (D. Md. June 8, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED