Goodman v. Smith
Opinion
Steven Wayne Goodman appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to defendants and denying Goodman’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(f) motion for a *453 discovery continuance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Goodman v. Smith, No. CA-00-986-7 (W.D.Va. filed Mar. 26, 2004 & entered Mar. 29, 2004). We grant Goodman’s motion to exceed the page limitation and deny his motions to remand, for consolidation, and for an informal briefing schedule. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Steven Wayne GOODMAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Vernon SMITH, Doctor; Lonnie Saunders; Rob Byrd; Deborah Swisher; Steve Hollar, Assistant Warden of Programs at ACC; Pamela A. Sargent, Assistant Attorney General for the Commonwealth; Captain Massey, ACC; Lieutenant Dawson, ACC; Lieutenant Boyer, ACC; Mr. Davenport, Counselor at ACC; Mr. Peters, Inmate Hearing Officer of ACC; Phyllis Bird, Director of the ACC Law Library, Defendants—Appellees, and Rob Marsh; John Doe, I; John Doe, II; Jane Doe; University of Virginia Medical Center, Defendants
- Status
- Unpublished