Truman v. Brooks

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit January 25, 2005

Opinion

No. 04-7186

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CA-03-841-2)

Submitted: December 15, 2004 Decided: January 25, 2005

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sven Patrick Truman, Appellant Pro Se. Anita K. Henry, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Sven Patrick Truman, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s orders: (1) accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000); and (2) denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Truman v. Brooks, No. CA-03-841-2 (E.D. Va.

June 2, 2004, and July 13, 2004). We grant Truman’s motion to

supplement his informal brief and dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

- 2 -