Nichols-Smith v. Branch Banking & Trust

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Nichols-Smith v. Branch Banking & Trust

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2224

MARY ANN NICHOLS-SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY; JENNIFER ALEXANDER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-03-368-3)

Submitted: December 10, 2004 Decided: January 25, 2005

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary Ann Nichols-Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia A. Piekarski, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, L.L.C., Winston-Salem, North Carolina, Edward Katze, Timothy R. Newton, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Mary Ann Nichols-Smith appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Nichols-Smith v. Branch

Banking & Trust Co., No. CA-03-368-3 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2004). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished