U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

Nichols-Smith v. Branch Banking & Trust

Nichols-Smith v. Branch Banking & Trust
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 25, 2005

Nichols-Smith v. Branch Banking & Trust

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2224

MARY ANN NICHOLS-SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY; JENNIFER ALEXANDER, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-03-368-3)

Submitted: December 10, 2004 Decided: January 25, 2005

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary Ann Nichols-Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia A. Piekarski, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, L.L.C., Winston-Salem, North Carolina, Edward Katze, Timothy R. Newton, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Mary Ann Nichols-Smith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Nichols-Smith v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., No. CA-03-368-3 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.