United States v. Adderly
United States v. Adderly
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7905
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LORENZO ADDERLY, a/k/a Kendrick A. McKenzie, a/k/a Son-Son,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-74)
Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 7, 2005
Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lorenzo Adderly, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Lorenzo Adderly appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion for a downward departure in his sentence.
Because Adderly had no pending challenge to his sentence and no
court had ordered his resentencing, we affirm the district court’s
determination that it lacked jurisdiction to grant the motion for
a downward departure. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished