Hurley v. P.F.Z. Properties, Inc.
Opinion
Anthony E. Hurley appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claim against Defendants and denying his subsequent Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hurley v. P.F.Z. Prop., Inc., No. CA-04-1545-WDQ (D. Md. filed June 30, 2004 & entered July 1, 2004; Aug. 3, 2004; Aug. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Anthony E. HURLEY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. P.F.Z. PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED; Jack Katz, Defendants—Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished